TM600.88 Spring 1997
Module 2
Instructional Overview
The following material distinguishes between types of innovations and describes innovation as a process. The sources of innovation are also identified. Specific emphasis is placed on innovation within existing organizations.
Introduction
As we discussed in the first class, whatever changes the wealth-producing power of existing resources constitutes and innovation, e.g., using weeds as phytomedicines. Innovations can be technical or social; some of the most profound innovations are social. For example, the hospital, in its modern form a social innovation of the eighteenth century, has had a greater impact on health care than many advances in medicine (Drucker, 1985, p. 31).
Innovations can be classified any number of ways. Northwestern professor Dr. Donald N. Frey, former chairman of Bell+Howell, has developed one useful taxonomy. (Click here for his Taxonomy of Innovation.) He distinguishes between incremental and seminal innovations, and whether their source is the market's pull or the technology's push.
Acknowledging the serendipity of the bright idea, Drucker (1985, pp. 35-36) identifies seven sources of innovation, four internal to the organization:
- Demographics
- Changes in perception, mood, and meaning
- New knowledge.
Each of these sources should be viewed in the context of a deliberate, thoughtful process. Innovation rarely occurs as a result of a "divine inspiration"; rather:
Therefore, an important part of technology management is monitoring and analyzing these sources of opportunity. Let's examine the seven sources more closely. Try to think of examples as you read.
Source: The Unexpected
Unexpected successes tend to be overlooked, or discounted, rather than capitalized upon. Drucker suggests several reasons for this:
- An expectation that the status quo -- prior to the unexpected success -- is the norm, and will continue indefinitely.
- A bias toward the comfortable and familiar, due to the functional (and parochial) viewpoints of many top managers.
- The embarrassment of the unexpected part of the success.
The lack of attention in management reporting to "doing better than expected".
Failures, unlike successes, cannot be rejected and rarely go unnoticed. But they are seldom seen as symptoms of opportunity (p. 46). They should be!
One example that Drucker describes is the failure of the Edsel, and how Ford regrouped and used the Thunderbird to approach the targeted market.
Source: Incongruities
These incongruities are usually manifest in the assumptions a company makes about its operating environment, industry, or customers. The challenge is that this source can really only be monitored from within -- yet assumptions are best identified and questioned from without.
Examples here might be the advent of the mini mills in the steel industry, the use of cargo containers in the shipping industry and the creation of superstations in the television industry.
Source: Process Need
Again, incongruities can highlight specific needs in a process. For example, in the early 1900's, telephone use projections indicated that every American woman of working age would have to work as a switchboard operator if calls continued to be switched manually.
Another way in which process need drives innovation is in "program research", where a process is converted from potential into reality (p. 73), e.g., the light bulb.
Drucker suggests that the trick is to find a weak or missing link in a process that is fairly self-contained and well understood. The key to success is a clear definition of the objective (e.g., distributing electric power to the masses) such that specifications for the solution can be defined clearly. Of course, this assumes that the requisite knowledge is available to fix the link.
Source: Industry and Market Structures
Industry and market structures may appear stable over the long term, but in reality can be quite dynamic. A change in industry structure offers exceptional opportunities, highly visible and quite predictable to outsiders (p. 81), such as MCI and Sprint in the long distance communications market.
Drucker identifies four near-certain, highly visible indicators of impending change in industry structure (pp. 83-85):
He cautions that simple strategies work best against these opportunities, and notes that the most successful of these innovations occur in industries dominated by one or few suppliers.
Source: Demographics
Changes in the population characteristics (size, age, employment, education, etc.) are monitored extensively. Interpreting the data correctly to identify opportunities is the challenge. Typically, business people do not factor demographic changes into short-term decisions -- even though the lead times of demographic shifts are often known. Recent demographic changes with a significant impact on industry: the baby boom, the baby bust, the advent of professional women, Latin American urbanization. An example of catering to a new population segment is Club Med:
Source: Changes in Perception
Drucker advocates a change in perception, looking at the glass as half-empty as opposed to half full, to identify potential opportunities. When a change in perception takes place, the facts do not change. The meaning does. (p. 104).
One example that I like is about Citibank, the first truly national bank in the US. It was their practice to recruit the best male business students in finance and marketing. In the 1970's they noticed that the best students in these fields were increasingly women. Most companies told their college recruiters to try harder to get the best men; Citibank started to aggressively recruit women (p.105).
Source: New Knowledge
Innovations stemming from new knowledge are the most sensational and tend to receive the most publicity. They are long in coming, and are less predictable. There is often a long lead-time between the emergence of new knowledge and its application.
This convergence makes knowledge-based innovations uniquely challenging.
Nurturing Innovation
As a technology manager, it is your responsibility to maintain the balance between the "relentless quest for predictable performance" and the "constant probing for change" (Steele, 1989, p. 69). You can nurture innovation by deliberately and routinely considering and assessing the seven sources. Doing so requires the full commitment of the organization to invest the necessary resources in the inherent uncertainties. It also takes the full attention of the innovator(s):
As with most endeavors, focus seems to be a key element for success in managing innovation.